The Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled that a young man was required to pay a sum of 22 thousand dirhams to a girl after he missed the crucial oath-taking session to absolve him of the plaintiff’s allegations.
The girl filed a lawsuit to demand that the young man pay the amount to her while obligating him to pay fees and expenses, after she handed him 27 thousand and 500 dirhams in exchange for lifting the deportation measure against a friend of hers, as he deluded her that he had relatives who worked in government agencies and could remove the deportation.
The plaintiff indicated that the defendant returned 5,500 dirhams of the amount to her and refused to return the remainder of it, pointing out that the only evidence she relies on are the letters and conversations between them, and pictures of the plaintiff’s financial transfer receipts, and she does not have any other document or witness, and she also submitted a request that included Directing the decisive oath to the defendant.
The court decided to administer the decisive oath to the defendant, and at the session scheduled for taking the oath, he did not appear despite being legally announced.
In the merits of its ruling, the court stated that the decisive oath directed by the plaintiff to the defendant met its legally prescribed conditions and did not contain any arbitrariness or violation of the law, public order, or morals. Therefore, the court accepted that it be directed to the defendant who announced it but did not attend, whether in person. Or by his legal representative, and thus he has renounced his oath given to him by the plaintiff, and the oath would have settled the dispute regarding the fact that his liability was occupied in favor of the plaintiff with the amount of the claim.
The court ruled to oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff 22 thousand dirhams, along with expenses.
Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news