A woman buys a car for 300,000 dirhams and has been procrastinating on paying for it for a year

The Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled that a woman was obligated to pay a man the sum of 300,000 dirhams, the price of a car she bought from him, and she refused to pay for it for a year.

In detail, a man filed a lawsuit against a woman, in which he demanded that she be obligated to pay him an amount of 300 thousand dirhams, and to address the Al Ain Traffic Department to show the registration of the vehicle that is the subject of the lawsuit, and to prove its transfer from his name to her name, indicating that he sold a car to the defendant for 300 thousand dirhams, provided that The price will be paid to him later, and he asked her to pay the price of the vehicle that was purchased approximately a year ago, but she did not respond, while the defendant submitted a memorandum of response to the lawsuit, in which she decided that she had purchased the vehicle. From the plaintiff for a price of 100 thousand dirhams, and she paid him the amount, and at its conclusion, she demanded that the lawsuit be dismissed while obligating the plaintiff to pay the fees and expenses.

During the consideration of the case, the prosecution witness explained, after taking the legal oath, that he was present when the defendant expressed her desire to buy the vehicle from the plaintiff for an amount of 300 thousand dirhams, and that after surrendering it in traffic, he was also present, and the plaintiff told him to be a witness that the defendant She will pay the amount to him, and he said that the defendant also admitted before him that she bought the vehicle from the plaintiff for 300 thousand dirhams, and that she did not pay the price.

The defendant said that she bought the vehicle in 2023 from the plaintiff, but she bought it for 100,000 dirhams, and that she withdrew the amount and delivered it to him. She provided a copy of an account statement showing the date the amount was withdrawn, while the plaintiff denied receiving the amount from the defendant.

The court ruled – before deciding on the matter – that the plaintiff take the complementary oath, which he swore in the form: “I swear by God Almighty, besides whom there is no god, that I have sold the defendant my vehicle for a price of 300 thousand dirhams, and that she has not delivered its price to me to date, and God is a witness to what I say.” .

The court explained in the merits of its ruling that it considered the witness’s statements, regarding the fact that he was present when the defendant purchased the vehicle from the plaintiff that is the subject of the case, that they are not sufficient to prove that the defendant’s liability is occupied by the plaintiff for the price of the vehicle, so the court directed the plaintiff to complete the complementary oath to complete the evidence, and he swore it in its form, and Then what is established for the court is that the defendant’s debt is still occupied by the plaintiff for the amount claimed, as a result of failure to pay the price of the vehicle, and the court ruled to oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 300 thousand dirhams, according to the reasons and expenses.

. The defendant told the court that she bought the car for 100,000 dirhams and paid the amount to the plaintiff.