An Arab woman seizes her friend’s money after hosting her at her home

A woman of the nationality of an Arab country was surprised by a strange behavior by her friend, who insisted on hosting her in her home until a suitable housing was found, as she was shocked when she saw her searched in her wallet and took 12 thousand dirhams from her, and when she asked her about the reason she told her that she needed the amount To it in just three days, which she did not abide by, and the Civil Court in Dubai obliged the defendant to return the amount.

In detail, an Arab woman filed a lawsuit against another of the same nationality, requesting that the defendant be obligated to return the amount of 12 thousand dirhams, seized by the wallet of her money, with legal interest, fees, expenses and law fees, and stated in a statement that she had submitted to Dubai with a tourism visa, She got acquainted with the defendant previously, and their relationship was strengthened to a kind of friendship, noting that the latter insisted on hosting her in her home instead of housing in a hotel, the plaintiff planned.

The prosecutor said that the defendant accompanied her to one of the exchange companies to replace an amount from her country’s currency to the dirham, and spend 12 thousand dirhams.

She added that she was in the bathroom, and when she went out, she was surprised by the defendant, opening her wallet and handing her money, and she was shocked by her behavior, and she asked her about the reason, so she told her that she would take the amount as an advance for three days. Her residence was forced to agree, and she continued that she waited for the latter’s commitment to her promise and pay the agreed amount, but she prolonged and refused to pay, which led her to prosecute her.

In turn, the defendant submitted a legal memorandum, in which she original in which she requested the refusal of the lawsuit for lack of health and evidence, and a reserve to refer the case for investigation and hearing the statements of witnesses, and in the context of the case the court heard the testimony of two witnesses, agreed that the plaintiff gave the amount to the defendant, and the latter pledged to pay it within three days, She did not return to her, noting that they were present at the time of the incident, and the court stated in the reasons for its ruling that it is legally prescribed, “the creditor must prove the prosecution in the debt from the authority of the trial court, provided that its extraction is desirable with what it has supported in the apparent papers on them.”

She added that she is reassuring the statements of the two witnesses on the incident, while the defendant did not present what opposes their testimonies, and then it has been proven to the court that the latter obtained an amount of 12 thousand dirhams from the plaintiff as a loan, and the court ruled that it compel her to return the amount with a legal interest of 5% until complete payment In addition to obliging them to expenses.