“Cassing” supports stone on a woman

The Court of Cassation rejected an appeal against the brothers of brothers to cancel a stone ruling on their sister and appoint an official social institution valued at it to take care of its money and interests, after the issuance of an elementary ruling supporting the appeal in a lawsuit filed by the sister of the interdisciplinary, in which he requests the verdict of stone for her sister for her mental discretion and appointing the institution valued at her. This was approved by the Court of First Instance, which refused to appoint one of its brothers.

The sister of the defendant had filed a lawsuit calling for the verdict of a stone against the defendant and assigning the stewardship of one of the social institutions concerned with the auspices of the palace, and she said in her claim that her sister has money to her from the legacy of her parents, but she is unable to dispense the affairs of herself and needs to appoint an existing on her.

While the defendant said that it is in its entire mental powers and does not need a valuable inauguration and requested the refusal of the lawsuit and a reserve to appoint a brother with her values, and the court of the first degree of the entry of the Care Corporation decided as an opponent in the lawsuit, and the representative of the Foundation answered that there is no objection to the institution to be valid for the interdicted, A report was reported by the competent medical committee appointed by the court stating that the defendant cannot rely on itself in the disposal of its affairs at the current time.

The court ruled to stone the defendant and appoint the Foundation to be valued at it to drain the affairs of the interdisciplinary on it, represent it, and end its transactions before all parties, demand its rights, receive its money, supervise, manage, preserve, apply, spend on it, and those who need them to spend their virtue without evaluating or wasting, and editing a list of its money and the funds that it shall be transferred to it and deposits it The penal pen in a period of two months after the start of its mission, and it must submit periodic accounts to the court about its actions in managing the money of the interdicated every 6 months and obliging the defendant to fees and expenses, so the interdicated person appealed the ruling, as well as the rest of her brothers, including her brother who demanded that he takes over the resurrection, and ruled the appeal to support the ruling They stabbed him before the Court of Cassation.