Obligating a young man to pay 5,000 dirhams in compensation for wasting a vehicle

The Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled that a young man was obliged to pay 5,000 dirhams to a car office in compensation for renting a car and wasting it. The court rejected the request for a lawsuit to involve the insurance company in the case, because it was filed in a way other than that prescribed by law.

In detail, a car rental office filed a lawsuit against a young man who rented a car, demanding that he be obligated to pay him 80,000 dirhams, 65,000 dirhams as a guarantee for the recovery of the value of the car, and 15,000 dirhams as compensation for material, psychological, and moral damage, in addition to fees and expenses and legal fees. Pointing out that the defendant took his own vehicle as a trust, squandered it, and was convicted of committing this act.

During the case, the young man was absent, and the office decided that the car was missing and he was unable to submit quotes on the car. It requested the inclusion of the insurance company insuring the car in the case, and amended its requests so that the opponent entered in the insurance policy committed to the amount of 50 thousand dirhams and obligated the defendant to compensate the plaintiff in the amount of 30 thousand dirhams. dirhams, obligating her and the young man to jointly pay the lawsuit fees and fees, while the opposing party’s lawyer demanded that the lawsuit not be accepted for filing it in a manner other than that prescribed by the law, and that the request for admission and removal be not accepted. From the lawsuit due to the absence of justifications and conditions required by the law to introduce a new opponent in the lawsuit. In the merits of the ruling, the court stated that the young man had been convicted in the criminal case on charges of squandering the vehicle owned by the office and delivered to him as a rental, to the detriment of the owner, and a judgment was issued against him in his presence, convicting him of what was attributed to him, and that judgment became final and conclusive, and therefore this criminal justice has A chapter on the common basis between the civil and criminal lawsuits in question, in the legal description of it and attributing it to its perpetrator.

The court ruled to accept the interlocutory request submitted by the plaintiff in form and in the place of entry, not to accept the lawsuit for filing it in a manner other than that determined by the law, and in the merits of the lawsuit to oblige the young man to pay 5,000 dirhams in compensation to the office.