“The High Federation” rejects a lawsuit to change the name of the citizen tribe

The Federal Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit filed by a citizen who has the nationality of the state by virtue of the law, to change the name of his tribe in the summary of his registration, to the name of another tribe, in which the responsible administrative authorities were specialized to cancel the negative decision to refrain from correcting the registration of his tribe, stressing that when a summary is extracted, it was done. The name of his tribe is mistakenly registered.

After reviewing the administrative authority more than once to correct that error, and raised it from its records, she refrained from responding, despite providing evidence in support of him, including a book from the ruler of the Emirate of Sharjah to correct the error. The lawsuit added that the Abu Dhabi Federal Court of First Instance ruled, and then appealed before the Abu Dhabi Federal Court of Appeal, which he ruled to support the ruling. The Federal Supreme Court mentioned the reasons for its rejection of the lawsuit that the appellant was based on his appeal on three reasons, the first is the difference of the body that heard the pleading in the appeal from the body that pronounced the ruling, and the court replied that this reason is not replaced, because if the body that issued the ruling is the same I uttered it, because the ruling is correct even if the lawsuit was seized for the ruling in the same session in which it was pronounced by the ruling, which is what actually happened, as it was reshaped by the barriers, and the appeal was re -for the pleading with another body, which is the same body that booked the lawsuit, and pronounced the ruling.

On the second reason that the appeal against the contested ruling for violating the decision of the first body on the investigation of the real name of the appellant, and that it is affiliated with another tribe, said that the trial court is not obligated to take any of the investigation procedures, whenever it finds enough in the case papers to form its belief In it.

On the third reason, the court said that the reason for the appeal is to be evident and clear, revealing the defects that the appellant attributes to the ruling, while the appellant did not show what the defense was shown, and the ruling was turned away from him, nor the documents he presented in support of his lawsuit.

He also did not specify the names of the witnesses whom the court turned away from hearing their certificates, nor their subject, or the party that they have been certified before, until the Federal Supreme Court stands after these violations on the judgment of the contested ruling, which must be rejected by the appeal.