Cancel 923 years in prison for “album”

The Dubai Court of Appeal canceled yesterday the ruling against Abed Al -Boom, stopping all the judicial procedures issued in the case, and referring it to the stakeholders to review the judicial committee issued by Decree No. 34 of 2009 after the first court court was imprisoning the 923 -year -old.

The court, headed by Judge Acer Fouad, refused to resume the Public Prosecution before the remaining defendants, and to support the special part of the ruling of the first degree of the judge to acquit all the accused.

The court built the reasons for its ruling that the prosecution broke the referral order on the fourth of June in 2009 that it indicated that the defendants were assigned to attend a session determined by the penal penal department, but it is clear that the penalty cases section sent a memorandum to the President of the Criminal Court on the ninth of August to form a circle to try the album, It was formed the next day, then on August 23 was set as the date for the first session, and the papers were removed from the defendant’s legally before that date.

This cuts certainty to the court that the accused Abed Al -Boom was not announced with a assignment paper to attend before the date of August 23, which is based on the law that the criminal lawsuit was by the accused Abed was not lawful before that date, which later on the date of the validity of the Dubai Ruler’s decree to form a committee A special judicial to liquidate the financial status of the owls, which was issued on the fourth of August, and indicated that all judicial procedures and human rights claims were stopped against the debtor, with the exception of reports and criminal cases against him and the rest of the accused. The court considered that, accordingly, all the judicial procedures should be suspended in the similar case, and referred it to the competent judicial committee.

The court considered that in light of the foregoing, the Court of Cassation cut off its ruling on one of the cases of misdemeanors in which the same album is accused, by interpreting Article 7 of the decree itself, that it does not include criminal cases after its issuance.

The first -class court issued its ruling to condemn the album, last February, and ruled for 923 years imprisonment for 3695 charges of betrayal of trust, and giving a check in bad faith, three months for each charge, and acquitted him of 11 charges, while the seven defendants were acquitted with him in the same case From the charges against them.

It is noteworthy that the case is known as the “phantom album”, in which the album is accused of charges of betrayal of trust and giving a check in bad faith by embezzlement of cash amounts that were handed over to them for use for the benefit of its owners by investing in the field of real estate investment, and giving 3700 checks that are not met in exchange for a standing and withdrawn fulfillment, in bad faith And accuses the rest of the criminal participation in betrayal of trust.