Gulf innocence and her son from the charge of insulting a director and threatening her with slaughter

The Ajman Court of Appeal updated a ruling to be acquitted, which was ruled by the first degree court against a Gulf and her son, accused of assaulting a manager in one of the departments and threatening her with slaughter, because the court did not check on the victims’ statements and the testimonies of witnesses.

The complainant said, in the investigations of the Public Prosecution, that she was at her workplace, when the accused attended the complainant to cut off the service from her home, so she informed her that she had returned checks, and she must pay her first, and in light of a state of difference about the payment mechanism, the accused shouted and contacted her son who attended In turn, the killing threatened.

She added that she did not attend the incident, but she was informed by the existing employees that the woman had insulted her, and she said that her son would run her in his car.

By asking the son, he denied the charge, and said that his mother contacted him because of a problem she was facing in that circle, so he went there, but he was surprised that the dye summoned the security men to get his mother out of the place, and his reaction did not exceed the mere question of the person who did so, then the police came.

While an eyewitness stated that she was at the head of her work in the department, and the woman came and asked to return the service, so she was told that this could only be through the section in which the complainant works, and then discussed together, she did not marvel at the accused result that shouted loudly, saying: You are one ignorant and not educated. Security policemen.

For her part, the accused mother said that she reviewed the department and met the complainant, and was surprised by the latter accusing her of returning the service illegally and has pictures that prove this, pointing out that she denounced the depiction of her house without her knowledge, as a violation of the privacy of the place, and she asked her for these pictures that the employee replied to her that she would keep With it, it must pay the fine if it wants to retrieve the service, and then the situation escalates.

For his part, the defense deputy for the accused, lawyer Muhammad Al -Awami Al -Mansouri, called for unloading the cameras in the place to ensure the authenticity of the incident, and the court stated to him to receive a copy of the registration, but no registration was brought.

Al -Mansouri prompted that the complainant said in the prosecution’s investigations that she did not exist and did not hear any threat from the accused, which cancels the charge of the attack, calling for the acquittal of the accused.

The first instance court ruled the acquittal of the defendants, confirming the reasons for the ruling that they did not prove that they were prohibited from carrying out its duties, and there was no violence against it, and the court does not reassure the complainant’s statements because it was hearing by witnesses that the court does not reassure their statements as well From any certain evidence to commit the charge, and condemnation is based on assertion and certainty, not suspicion or possibility.

The court did not reassure the victims ’statements and witnesses.