The other side of the generosity showed … an Arab woman shocking her friend with a strange behavior

A woman of Arab nationality was surprised by a strange behavior by her friend, who insisted on hosting her in her home until she was found on a suitable housing, as she was shocked when she saw her searching in her wallet, taking 12 thousand dirhams, and when I asked her about the reason she told her that she needed the amount and would return it to it within three Just days, which you did not adhere to.

In detail, an Arab woman filed a lawsuit against another of the same nationality, requesting that the defendant be obligated to return the amount of 12 thousand dirhams, which he seized from the portfolio of her money with legal interest, fees, expenses and law fees.

In a statement, she stated that she had submitted to Dubai with a tourism visa, and she had previously met the defendant and strengthened their relationship to a kind of friendship, noting that the latter insisted on hosting her in her home a country of housing in a hotel, according to the plaintiff.

The prosecutor said that the defendant accompanied her to one of the exchange companies to replace an amount in the currency of her country to the dirham, and spend 12 thousand dirhams.

She added that she was in the bathroom and when she went out, she was surprised by the defendant, opening her wallet, and with her money, and she was shocked by her behavior and asked her about the reason, so she told her that she would get the amount for the advance for three days. In her residence she had to agree.

She added that she waited for the latter’s commitment to her promise and pay the agreed amount, but she prolonged and refused to pay, which led her to sue.

In turn, the defendant submitted a legal memorandum in which she original in which she asked for the refusal of the lawsuit for lack of validity and evidence, and a reserve, to refer the lawsuit for investigation and hear the statements of witnesses.

In the context of the lawsuit, the court heard two witnesses, which agreed that the plaintiff gave the amount to the defendant, and the latter pledged to pay it within three days, and did not return it to it, pointing out that they were present at the time of the incident.

In the reasons for its ruling, the court stated that it is legally prescribed, the creditor must prove the prosecution in the debt of the trial court, provided that its extraction is formulated with what it has supported in the apparent papers on them.

She added that she is reassuring the statements of the two witnesses on the incident, while the defendant did not present what opposes their testimonies, and then it has been proven to the court that the latter obtained an amount of 12 thousand dirhams from the plaintiff as a loan, and requires that it be required to return the amount with a legal interest of 5% until the full payment, And obligating it to expenses.