US Ready to Resume Attacks on Iran, Defense Secretary Warns at Shangri‑La
US ready to resume attacks on Iran, Defense Secretary says in talks; Washington weighs a 60‑day ceasefire extension as negotiators push for a permanent deal.
US Defense Secretary’s Remarks in Singapore
On Saturday, May 30, 2026, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told attendees at the Shangri‑La Dialogue in Singapore that Washington remains prepared to resume attacks on Iran if negotiations fail. The statement came as US and Iranian negotiators work to bridge outstanding differences and secure a lasting settlement to the conflict. Hegseth framed the readiness as a deterrent measure, saying the United States retains the capability to act if required.
His comments were delivered during the premier regional security forum for defence and foreign policy officials, where leaders from across Asia and beyond addressed the widening diplomatic effort. The remarks highlighted the high stakes of the current diplomatic window and underscored the message that military options remain on the table while talks continue.
Readiness to Resume Strikes, Officials Say
Hegseth emphasised that US forces are “more than capable” of resuming strikes on Iran if an agreement cannot be reached, noting ample munitions and global stocks. He said the United States would not hesitate to use force should diplomatic efforts collapse, framing that option as part of a broader strategy to prevent escalation. The comments were presented as a clear signal to Tehran and allied regional partners about Washington’s resolve.
The defence chief’s language was firm but measured, stressing capability rather than an immediate intent to strike. That posture is consistent with a two‑track approach: pressing for a diplomatic settlement while keeping military options viable as leverage.
Munitions Stockpiles and Industrial Ramp‑Up
Hegseth told delegates the US is significantly expanding its defence industrial base to increase munitions production, aiming to produce multiple times current output in the near term. He said inventories both in-theatre and worldwide are “more than sufficient” now but pledged to scale manufacturing to “two, three, or four times” existing rates to sustain potential operations. The planned industrial acceleration is intended to ensure operational readiness without compromising commitments in other regions.
The official framed the industrial push as prudent planning rather than preparation for inevitable war, arguing it would allow the US to execute simultaneous operations if required. He also suggested increased production would provide the logistical cushion needed to fund and support global operational plans.
Balancing Indo‑Pacific Commitments
Addressing concerns about US focus in Asia, Hegseth insisted Washington has not turned its back on the Indo‑Pacific despite the Middle East engagement. He argued that the United States can “do two things at once,” maintaining both regional security commitments and an enduring presence across Asia. The message was aimed at reassuring allies who have voiced worry that attention to the Iran conflict might weaken the US posture in the Pacific.
The defence secretary’s remarks sought to reassure partners that force structure, alliances, and deterrence in the Indo‑Pacific will be preserved. Officials at the forum underscored that logistical adjustments and increased production capacity are central to sustaining simultaneous operations across multiple theatres.
White House to Decide on Ceasefire Extension
President Donald Trump, Hegseth said, is “patient” and seeking a “big deal” that would definitively prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Trump is expected to convene a secure meeting in the White House to make a “final decision” on a proposal that could extend the current truce — negotiated in early April — for another 60 days. Such an extension would grant negotiators additional time to translate interim arrangements into a permanent end to hostilities.
The potential 60‑day extension reflects a pragmatic pause to allow diplomacy to move forward while preserving the option of a more forceful response. Administration officials have framed the deliberation as weighing the diplomatic gains of extended talks against the risks of allowing Iran more time to consolidate its position.
Regional Security Implications for the Gulf
Hegseth’s statements and the possibility of a renewed military campaign carry immediate implications for Gulf security and energy markets. Gulf states, including the UAE, are weighing the prospects of renewed hostilities alongside diplomatic efforts that could stabilise the region. Regional leaders have been closely monitoring the talks and US posture to assess risk to shipping lanes, energy infrastructure, and the security umbrella that many states depend upon.
Analysts say any resumption of attacks would likely prompt rapid diplomatic outreach to manage escalation and protect economic interests across the Gulf. Equally, a successful diplomatic deal that prevents nuclearisation could reduce regional tensions and lower the likelihood of broader conflict.
The talks in Singapore underscored the delicate balance between deterrence and diplomacy as negotiators press for a durable settlement while military planners maintain options to respond if diplomacy fails.
